Indicator challenge: where it stands after two sessions

I am taking an Apex 50K evaluation using only my indicator’s trades, FTS Liquidity Sweep Pro. Target: $3,000 of profit; the account is lost $2,000 below its highest close. I risk 2% per trade, that is $1,000: two full losses are still enough to blow the account. Every session is published, losers included.

Three trades closed at break-even, including one where I moved my stop too early while price went on to the target without me. Then a fourth at 1 R. The account ends at $51,119.80. The indicator had placed the levels well; my management is what fell short.

Sell signal at 06:05 (New York time), entry after it on the CISD (change in state of delivery): 19 micro gold sold at 4,217.3, bought back in three parts, the last one on a stop moved below the entry. The counter-trend buy signal at 05:25 was not taken: no displacement and no CISD after it. Plus a tiny trade opened by mistake and closed straight away. The account ends at $52,284.76.

$52,284.76, that is $2,284.76 of profit: $715.24 are left to the target, and the margin over the threshold is $2,000, exactly two full losses. The account is closer to the target than to the threshold, but one bad session can wipe it all out.

And two sessions prove nothing: five trades are far too few to judge a method, and I will draw neither a win rate nor a return from them. What they show is where it all plays out: the tool spots, the trader decides.

If the evaluation passes, risk drops to 1% to go after the first payout. If it fails, that episode will be published like the others. Every session lands on the challenge page, and you can comment on each episode: would you have taken these trades?